Starring: Nicolas Cage, Rose Byrne, Chandler Canterbury
Directed by: Alex Proyas (“I, Robotâ€)
Written by: Alex Proyas (“Dark Cityâ€), Juliet Snowden (“Boogeymanâ€), Stiles White (“Boogeymanâ€), Stuart Hazeldine (debut), Ryne Douglas Pearson (debut)
Actor Nicolas Cage has only been making consistently terrible choices in movies since 2006, so why does it seem longer?
After doing a fine job in the Oliver Stone–helmed “World Trade Center†where he played a New York City Port Authority police officer, Cage went on a massive losing streak with critical bombs including “The Wicker Man,†“Ghost Rider,†“Next†and “National Treasure: Book of Secrets,†and “Bangkok Dangerous.†While it’s only been three years of cinematic gaffes, the torture Cage has put us through seems endless.
He continues his mission of futility with his latest bomb, “Knowing,†an absurd sci-fi movie posing as an end-of-the-world thriller, both of which support the idea that moviegoers should always do their research before going to the theater and raise a red flag when a production gives more than a couple of screenwriters credit for the work. In “Knowing,†five (!) writers are credited and none of them come close to making anything credible or inventive.
It might be just a mediocre combination of ideas, but “Knowing†ends up being a haphazard mess starting from the top. Cage plays John Koestler, a college professor and astrophysicist who stumbles onto a sort of numerical puzzle that reveals the dates, coordinates, and death toll of the world’s most major tragedies.
The list of random numbers comes from a time capsule buried 50 years prior at the school where John’s son Caleb (Chandler Canterbury) now attends. Back in 1959, schoolchildren were given an assignment to draw a picture of what they thought the world would look like in the future. Instead of drawing robots and astronauts like her classmates, one of the students, Lucinda Embry (Lara Robinson), an antisocial little girl with dark circles under her eyes who hears voices, begins to handwrite a sequence of numbers on her paper.
Fifty years later, Caleb ends up taking the excavated note home where his father begins to decipher what it means. For this plot point, all the five-headed screenwriting team could come up with for John’s interest in the numbers is that a stain he accidently makes on the paper directs his eyes to the numbers 9112001, code for the attacks on 9/11. From there, John, like Jim Carrey in “The Number 23,†becomes obsessed with his set of digits, the last of which point to the date of the earth’s demise.
The end of the world doesn’t come soon enough as Proyas and his team focus more on the computer-generated disaster scenes than they do on the actual narrative. Cage and the rest of the cast, which includes Rose Byrne (“28 Weeks Laterâ€) as Diana Wayland, Lucinda’s grown daughter, become pawns for the unpredictable albeit mangled conclusion. “Knowing†thinks it’s more meaningful than it actually is, and that’s the most disturbing part of its inconspicuousness.