Untraceable
Starring: Diane
Lane, Billy Burke, Colin Hanks
Directed
by: Gregory Hoblit (“Fracture”)
Written
by: Robert Fyvolent (debut), Mark Brinker
(debut), Allison Burnett (“Autumn in New York”)
By Kiko
Martinez
Not
everything about the new tech-thriller “Untraceable” is
ridiculous and worthy of deletion, but most of it is. If
there is a saving grace it must be Diane Lane, who could
thrive in this genre if there was a workable screenplay
to match what the classic beauty can do as an actress.
It happened
in 2002 when Lane was nominated for her first Oscar in
the dramatic thriller “Unfaithful.” In that film, Lane
peeled back the layers of Connie Sumner, a wife and
mother emotionally torn between her family and her
lover.
In
“Untraceable,” it’s the screenwriters (three of them to
be exact), who are doing most of the cheating. Two
newbies and the writer behind the sad and sappy film
“Autum in New York” is an unusual combination that
falters around the time the picture should kick into
high gear.
It’s
simple enough to guess from the title of the movie that
either someone or something can’t be found. Turns out
the missing link is a murdering computer geek who has
created a Web site (killwithme.com)
where visitors can assist in the killing of one of his
victims by simply logging on.
It doesn’t
seem like much to worry about at first for FBI Cyber
Crime detective Jennifer Marsh (Lane) and her team of
Portland-based Internet-browsing personnel. The killer
makes his presence known by offing a kitty (don’t all
serial killers have a history of animal violence?) on
the World Wide Web. But when he starts kidnapping actual
humans and rigging them to his computer system, Jennifer
must do everything she can to find the whereabouts of
the sadist before he broadcasts another death.
Where the
film could have possibly made some sort of statement on
the media’s influence on society and the curiosity the
everyman has with violence (they mention the video of
the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel
Pearl, which made its rounds on the net back in 2002),
“Untraceable,” instead, goes for basic clichéd scenes
where FBI agents knock down doors and come up empty. Why
not just call it “CSI: Portland” and save us a trip to
the theater? Plus, once the identity of the killer is
revealed fairly early in the film (and you realize that,
in fact, he is as dorky as any stereotypical computer
programmer with an evil grin), there’s no reason to
invest in the film especially if you’re the type of
moviegoer who craves the unobvious.
Transparent and less shocking than the film thinks it
really is, “Untraceable” is nothing more than a
high-tech torture flick that’s heavy on the gore and
light on the logic. Grade: C-